A recent article illustrates how the F-35 is not in a dog fight
with the F-16 but is actually micro managing combatants to its own demise. The
Article of note headlines.
It becomes a "Winging It" reading assignment structured
towards unconventional aerial warfare. The F-35 does not dogfight, it
just out thinks any known aircraft today, and into the future for
years to come! Please refer to the link above for a different perspective on
the F-35 and why its problematic architecture must use resolve for fixing
the amalgamated war fighting capability. The word fusion is tossed about when
naming the conceptualized intent of bringing all things together that has inherently
evolved since flying began.
The F-35 is not an evolution of faster, bigger, or more mobile
fighter when it doesn't have to be. It just cheats during the
waring conflicts of the air. The F-35, as this article illustrates, and then I go on (metaphorically), how a pudgy little bumble bee can fly
circles around the other insects of the air and strike with a finality not yet
experienced in aerial combat.
Keep in mind the word "fusion", its key to this whole discussion, and why pilots are learning to love flying this aircraft. The pilots see it all (helmet) and then they see it all again (electronic fusion/sensors), without even an adversary noticing the F-35 has its number. The first question up, why dogfight? Second question up why the need for speed?
Keep in mind the word "fusion", its key to this whole discussion, and why pilots are learning to love flying this aircraft. The pilots see it all (helmet) and then they see it all again (electronic fusion/sensors), without even an adversary noticing the F-35 has its number. The first question up, why dogfight? Second question up why the need for speed?
Read on via the link above and you will understand why a faster
horse travelling can't beat an automobile or why the F-16 can't run with the
F-35.
No comments:
Post a Comment