America is Not Wired For Democratic Socialism

In a perfect world. In fact, all socialized/communistic countries have failed to grow its promise of perfection when all its citizens are pounded down to ground level and the select few rises above the dust.

To promote a socialist bent in this nation is a signal that this republic is extinct. People's rules guide each and every citizen on a value system. This election year, 2020, has reared its ugly head up suggesting socialism as the answer when measured against true Replic's democracy. PEOPLE vote for freedom and not for something you can't do for your self during the 2020 election this coming November.

FLASH BACK CASA BONITA DAYS

 Casa Bonita days Starts here 

let's all just flash Back to 2017.

Okay homies, old people can fly too!

The Return Of The Max

The much beleaguered 737 Max has cost Boeing time and money. At this time, it would be best to start with a clean sheet design for the whole of Boeing's family of aircraft. Starting with an NMA (clean-sheet design), then 787 and finally the 777X. Since Boeing has dived back from an NMA design to say it's back to the drawing board. It tells me Boeing has shifted to a long-overdue strategy of competing with Airbus rather than giving it the cold shoulder of industrial might.

Boeing is going back to its database to find a solution to its main drag, the 737 Max. Boeing will come up with a logical business decision. Doing a model that uses its all-new library of technology and build a span over the A-321 and A320 family of aircraft. That is a sensible corporate move. The 737 Max program was a "Bridge too Far". It put Boeing behind the count to Airbus' pitching. In order to get Boeing back in the game as a winner, it must plug in a model which will remake the single-aisle concept all together seven years ahead of this moment.

Boeing has to develop for the future on the QT. The 737 won't go past 2027 as a viable aircraft it must now go clean sheet to answer all of Boeing's corners it found itself in. The 737 was designed for the 1960's airport. Fifty years later it needs an NMA that goes from Seattle to Denver or Missoula to Las Vegas holding above 175 passengers. Embraer is the new Single Aisle concept and the NMA is Boeing's entry into service up to five thousand miles or 270 people. That is why Boeing has hinted at a new clean-sheet design. It's going to stuff the NMA with all new technology for an airframe that will be in the market place for the next 50 years as the 737 has served the last 50 years. Boeing bought Embraer commercial aircraft to kill the 737 from its own manufacturing line. Boeing was sloppy with its intent and now it is paying a big price.

However, Boeing is going back behind the curtain and will announce what its sea change is going to be to the aviation world by 2021.

Pictorial History Of The A350 Until the 350th A-350

A-350 History In Pictures

Bamboo Ponders The 7779X For a Dozen

Is this the hammer on the 777X contained on this blog with so many 777X features to write about? 

Yeah! 

Everything else is abysmal and the 777X will change the world to boot. Say what you will, about an A-350  and called then call the 777X a "crazy 8". Put another 50 seats in it and call it "9 Lives". The ultimate moneymaker is in flight testing mode. The 787 made the 777X possible with carbon fiber 235' wings and dimmable extra-large windows and wide -bogy smugness. Those who always "want fries with that" will get a comfortable seat on a Hong Kong express. Boeing has leaped frog its main competitor, Airbus. 

The 777X will exceed anything called A-350 or A-380. The orders will start at the next airshow which happens to be at Farnborough, Great Britain.  A decent place for announcing deals from cruisers of the aviation world. "Damn the GE's engines and flank speed ahead." 

Make your own short-list below of where and the aviation cruiser order.

• Bamboo Airlines: Done (12 777 9X orders Farnborough) 
• Singapore Airlines: ( 20 777X's 6 8X and 14 9X) 
• ANA ( 6, 777-9X)
• United Airlines (12 777-9X)
• New Zealand Air (4, 7778X) 

Turkish Airlines ( 4,777 8X and 6 777 9X) 

Total Farnborough book 78 777X's

Has Boeing Become An Aviation Pariah?

Pariah, a word denoting something or someone who is looked down upon. Boeing is getting a skittish response in the world of aviation for any of its products not just because of the Max 737 failure but for its trust with customers. Whether or not this is fair remains to be seen! But Boeing has a mountain to climb and it cannot play with all its tools it has because of the corporate culture it has embedded into its thinking. A culture that acts upon so-called stockholder value. A stockholder doesn't know how to build an airplane but Boeing is losing stock value as it managers play to those who must hire gardeners to mow there own lawns let alone set timers on for lawn sprinkler systems.

The world has taken note of the stockholder's inability to move Boeing in the correct direction. Boeing looks to cheapen its product to please its investors and not the passenger and there you have the Max crash problem that Boeing brought upon themselves. Build it cheaper and investors will come. Now you have none ordering Boeing airplanes during 2019. The 777X is struggling as well as the 787 not receiving orders. Interest in Boeing products has bottomed, The Max Crash is the tip of the corporate iceberg. Harvard business school grads make poor airplane builders but they are great at making money on the cheap.

Too many business school grads have turned the world of Boeing customers away from Boeing's product. Those who remain at Boeing and control its culture will drive the airplane into the ground because they are not a culture of flying but of profits. Boeing can make and turn to have greater trust with its potential customers if it returns to building safe and solid airplanes for its customers and by demonstrating that they are a capable airplane company.  They must leave the building of aircraft to its experts and not its bean counters. Yes, bean counters are needed but not in the R&D or production process.

I was Thinking Back In 2012

Back on Sunday, December 30, 2012, Winging It knew what was coming from Boeing's wide-bodied aircraft. For a historical perspective click on the link below.

The 777X Project Is Going Underground Call It Project X

Almost Five Years Ago I Had a Boeing "Told You So", Moment

The 787-300 Lost But Not Forgotten

It came to my brain box a long time ago, long after it was first thought off. The time was probably when Boeing was pushing forward on three 787-3-8-9 model types in 2010. A lot of water has been flown over since then and my imagination was stuck on the 777X program at the time. Please read the link below for how wacked I was about the 777 airplanes. For those who have been following this blog for a long time, there will be a link supplied just below to see the early beginnings of this blog.

The 777X Project Is Going Underground Call It Project X

Boeing had already gone several years into a big body airplane known as the 747, and it was dead as a market player. But Pride cometh before the fall. Stop whipping a dead horse. The 747-8i, and 737 Max are all dead Boeing horses by 2012. This revelation should have made Boeing move in a great way, but instead, it ripped the opportunity apart Just as Nancy Pelosi ripped apart Trump's State of the Union address. The nation may heal but Boeing may not since those Golden Parachute VP have already bought a Puget Sound Yacht.

Boeing Strategic Review

The first point to make is: 

• Commercial aviation product must match its strategic plan

Boeing has failed to complete its aviation product line when it had the opportunity from 2015 until 2020. The long road to catching-up has begun it may take 10 years to complete its product line.  The important items are beginning to matriculate out of its strategies like the 777X program and a relationship with GE jet engines through this 777X process. The prior strategic plan did not match where the industry is going while its main competitor strived to become a customer hound by building commercial jet with more room. Those roomier jets are not technologically better but are more popular for ticket-buying customers to ride somewhere.

• The 737 concept must be eliminated:

Long ago, the runway standing of the 737 was too shallow making engine builders build around the low clearance on the runway, while making the engine move forward, and finally, the low airplane standing at take-off required an inadequate MCAS system that would fly the 737 MAX to its doom. Get rid of the 737 as its clearance on take-off is too limiting of the 737 engines and safety issue as the airplane is now out of balance with engines too far forward on the wing, and its poor center of gravity put the Max into flying peril as to what could be described as unsafe. The 737 should have been canceled before Airbus would build its first A300 series airplane. If it had changed the 737 to a baseline single-aisle by 1980. it would of not be in the situation today it now finds itself. The 737  is killing Boeing and collapsing stock-holder value. Its bold Max move did not solve the 737 problems at all. Now the strategic move must include huge risk and expenditure beyond investors want. It must strategically change aviation to win. It must build a smaller market airport plane using the 783-300 or even a 787-200  using smaller dimensions.

• The Twin/Twin is a concept worth pursuing. 

Here's the premise for this gap plugger starting a step down from the 787-8. here are a few rules. Twin aisles/Twin engines or a better achieving twin/twin airplane. Keep building the 737 because you are stuck with that concept, but use what you have already paid for during the 787 programs. Start with the 787-300 design and then size it for 200-270 passengers. Go seven ago with a reasonable body width. Twin-aisle means fast-on and fast-off and big windows for everybody! Partner with Embraer having them bring forward a respectable single-aisle starting at 75 seats up to 175 seats according to a model both Boeing and Embraer can build. The strategic goal is for Boeing to make The NMA and Embraer make the single-aisle family of aircraft. It a big headache to do a sea change but so is it a bigger headache to crash airplanes and lose the market from greed. It's going to be a long time before Boeing recovers from its current greedy mistake shoved on the flawed 737 Max, but in order to regain the lead in the industry, it must rethink its family of aircraft from the top (777X) to Bottom  (E's 170- 200).

The Boeing 777X Order Backlash

Why doesn't Boeing have 1,000 777X orders for both the 777-9X and 777-8X aircraft since so many 777-300ER's are in existence?

The answer is the loss of Boeing confidence on new technology as it has proven to be a risky business to buy a new Boeing technology as found in the 737 MAX since its two crashes. 

Only 309 777X orders demonstrate this fallen confidence since no new orders have been placed recently. But the hope remains that after successful fight testing and entry into service that will change if Boeing can win back customer confidence it had lost during the 737 Max debacle. The order backlash is comprised of loss of customer confidence and a tighter financial economy existed back when it was first announced. Below are Boeing objectives:

• Error-free testing of major systems advanced on the 777X in 2020
• Successful entry into service during the first 18 months through 2021
• Customer success with 777X Family of aircraft
• The Max crash "recovers" by "big" steps taken by Boeing
• Finally, the 777X storms the market, by selling another 300 aircraft after entry into service through 2022.

Boeing Has A 777X Test Plan

Test Plan Link

The 777X test plan is found in the above link if only someone would put on the mantle of logging flights, time, and other sundries associated with the 777X. let me know via email at :

Trapperpk@gmail.com

I will make it a link for me if you blog the data. Thanks in advance!

Hey Boeing!!! "What about a 787-300 TYPE For The NMA?"

Boeing, it's in your face but you can't see past your nose after the Max crashed. You could have a twin/twin continental buster using lessons learned from the 787 projects, especially the 787-300 before it was unceremoniously dropped. If they rolled out the 787-300, it may catch Airbus flat-footed, as they wouldn't be able to respond with its A350 or A320 families of aircraft. After-all this is your new passion, stop the Euro insanity emitting from Airbus. Go PW or GE but not Rolls engines and make an NMA narrow twin/twin from 200-250 seats and "bam!" 

"Airbus is not your uncle!" FLIGHT GLOBAL

Flying The Big 777-9X "Pilots Said", read on for response.

The snippets from the first flight from the 777 9X suggest success for normal airplane model first flight. The pilot did what they were paid to do praise the newest airplane of the Boeing fleet as the most advance airplane when making progressions forward over its competitors. The first flight is meant to be a debutant moment when the "Queen" starts the ball. It had done so with the 747 with that ball many years ago in the seventies when there was no other to compare with the 747. Then came to the 737,757, NG, 787, MAX  and finally this family of aircraft, the 777X's. 

Boeing did not mess with Max MCAS  and other blocks of ideas coming from the 737 MAX program. It won't duplicate the MCAS used on Max by installing MCAS system computers and systems driven by flying out of flight trim. However, Boeing will fix all miscellaneous function errors and replace accordingly all those systems and parts from other systems found failed during testing of parts. Pure and simple the Max failure was of a single-aisle airplane that should have never been made during the 1970s, Design feature was not addressed with an opportunity of a remake of its design. The Max is just a workaround for fixing the single-aisle low engine wing station shoved forward. MCAS would have to control the 737 with only one sensor protecting the flight. Once computing from the one MCAS sensor failed the plane literally fell out of the air with a fail system reading data in an inappropriate manner. The 777X program has more on track than any other program Boeing has at this time. Live long and prosper.


This Article is available for a further comment @ GEEKWIRE

• “It was awesome,” 777X chief test pilot Van Chaney told reporters at Seattle’s Boeing Field, where the nearly four-hour flight test ended at 2 p.m. PT".

• Chaney said he would have stayed up longer if he could. “The moment we lifted off and got into the air, I thought, ‘Man, this is amazing.’

•  "Amazing” was also the word that co-pilot Craig Bomben, who serves as Boeing’s vice president of flight operations and chief test pilot, used to describe the landing.

• “We came in under fairly tough conditions,” Bomben said. “Bounced around a little bit, took turbulence [but] the airplane went right through it.”

First and Most Successful Landing From First Flight 777X