My Blog List

Thursday, June 9, 2016

When Do You Know The 787 Has Reached Maturity?

"Boeing reorg streamlines 787 production oversight"

So says the "Seattle Times" and Beverley Wyse, Chef 787 trouble shooter from Charleston, SC. Who has repositioned herself back to Seattle as... President of Shared Services or whatever the heck that is. It sounds like a golden parachute was deployed for her as loose ends have been mopped up for Charleston’s production output.

"Along with a shift in the reporting structure for management of its 787 production sites on opposite coasts, the company announced Beverly Wyse will be president of its Shared Services Group.”

It also signals a bench mark is now in place for reaching 14 787's a month with a joined effort of its Everett, Wa. facility. Beverley is ready to collect a career dividend with a new functionary duty of Boeing's Shared Services Group. "Huh?"  

... "which provides common internal services and systems company wide."

Once more, huh? 

Therefore:

She’ll be replaced by Joan Robinson-Berry, 56, a former McDonnell Douglas executive who has held many supplier management, business and engineering positions at Boeing. Robinson-Berry will have overall responsibility for the South Carolina site, which includes engineering and 737 MAX work, but she won’t be involved in day-to-day 787 Dreamliner operations there.

Dave Carbon, the vice president of 787 operations in South Carolina, will report not to Robinson-Berry but to Mark Jenks, 55, the Everett-based leader of the 787 program.

One last time, Huh?

The music has stopped and everyone is told to please sit down in the nearest chair. All this suggest Boeing is extremely confident in its leadership for a mature program such as the 787. The airplane wars has new generals at the helm and Boeing's battery issue is so last decade. Gone are supply chain problems, gone are strayed rivets and errant shims. The 787 has arrived as a staple Boeing mechanism towards profitability.

Saturday, June 4, 2016

100 More Journals to Reach 1000 and I'll Take a Break

It’s been about 2 and 1/2 years and over 900 entries into this blog concerning aviation, Boeing and modern military marvels. I hope to complete the 1000th journal by end of 2016. If not it will be the beginning of 2017 in January. It is the journal's hope to bring interested people to the forefront of Boeing's endeavors in a biased manner. It is also this journal's intent to write about and log opinion and articles about military jets and progress. I have featured the Destroyer class DDG-1000 because it’s a modern marvel. 

The last hundred journal entries will include putting the 787-10 progressions to bed and the Boeing 777X in a complete configuration as it exits through 2016. At about the halfway point for 2016 there are many more talking points to sort through. Up to this point, it has been a challenge to include what would be interesting for this blog/journaling. However, the topics are infinite and are changing the world we live in within the framework of the Boeing products.

The transition of air travel is paced by the 787 as the A350 has too few copies flying to effect the world of travel at this time. Therefore, the 787 is changing the travel culture to anywhere, anytime and with any value for the passenger.


Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Boeing Meets Twelve 787 A Month For 90 Days

Acknowledging "All Things 787" for base data. Charts are created by Winging It for monthly recap. 

Below are fifty-three 787 delivered YTD. This suggests if Boeing delivers 12 more during June it will obtain Sixty-five 787 delivered at the halfway point during 2016 making for a 130 unit time for 2016. However, Boeing has a tentative eighteen 787 for delivery in June, thus opening up the strong possibility Boeing will meets its own guidance during 2016 delivering about 138 787 for the 2016 effort.



The 90 day moving average totals of 12 month, suggests Boeing has kept its guidance of twelve 787 a month on track during this period of time. Boeing has work to do going forward as it has depleted its production backlog for future month deliveries and has schedule a substantial number of units for both the months of June and July. If Boeing does meet its goal in June for 18 units and in July for 13 units, then it will demonstrate mastery over its production output for the 787.






The 787-9 has taken the production in a dominating way as it now out produces the 787-8 by almost a 2-1 pacing ratio during the last sixty days. The 787-8 production is dropping as fast as the 787-9 production is increasing as scheduled. The indication is the 787-9 is on a solid transition and also indicates the production does not have any noteworthy problems other than normal day to day issues resolved with-in each production cycle.



The 787-9 demonstrates a 2-1 advantage for in production units as demonstrated below.



Eighteen Are Scheduled For Delivery for June 2016 numbering 4 787-8's and 14 787-9's


Thirteen Are Scheduled For Delivery for July 2016 
Three 787-8's and 10 787-9's


Sunday, May 29, 2016

The MAX-X Formerly Known As The "MOM"

The problem then is found in the marketing point where aircraft parts for a Max-X would be significantly different than its formal offering on current Max types. However, Boeing is already stuck with a stand-alone type citing its aging 757, as it loses airspace due to its eminent retirement. A 737 Max 10-X is under consideration as reported by Reuters

The real decision tree will be based on units "possibly ordered" if it decides taking this route. The Max-10X would have to have 1,000 plus units committed "what Ifs",  in order to spend scarce resource capital on a new single aisle type. Boeing is taking a customer headcount on how many would order if launched or announced. 
The window for a decision of this nature will come soon after the 777X makes first delivery so Boeing will take the next four years making that decision before announcing. It is just in the white board phase of concept with erasers being handy. 

The key to this mystery is coming from what the engine makers are doing to develop an engine fit for this new aircraft configuration. If CFM is testing a larger Leap-1 it isn't for Airbus and it won't fit on a current 737, therefore the Max-10 is under consideration with some developmental money on the table. The MOM could be a reality by 2021.


Saturday, May 28, 2016

What IF The F-22 Inventory Grows

The what-ifs are tossed about as Generation 4.5 F-22 resurgence appears on the horizon. The F-22 could impact the F-35 and it should not become a reality until the F-35 reaches IOC or has proven its fifth generation status in actual world time duties. The F-22, became a much beleaguered program so much that Lockheed Martin were only allowed to build 187 of its type during the first decade of the 21st century. However, things happen such as ISIS, Iraq and all things terrible in the world and the F-22 had a real world shake down.



It proved to be a real fighter, and so much better than a 4.0 fighters, the Air Force wants another (at least) 200 F-22 in its inventory. It’s truly a remarkable aircraft as it covers the battle field with two engines and can benefit from the F-35 development. The F-35 and F-22 have a symbiotic relationship. Everything learned on the F-35 program may transfer to the F-22 standing inventory. The Air Force would like to increase its standing F-22 force as the world's most capable fighter in its time slot. The F-35 can give the F-22 some of its highly developed and secret capabilities. The F-22 is very fast with two engines and has Gen 4.5 stealth capability. It’s a blue collar fighter with all the bells and whistles that any adversary regrets meeting in air space. It can out fly China, Russia and any other nations most advanced fighter. 

The F-22 will give the F-35 more time in the tinkering shop to make it whole. If the F-35 is a fifty year airplane, then its concurrency has fallen behind its fifty year objectives through its slow maturation into service. The F-22 can cover for F-35 as a wing man would in aerial combat. It can give much needed cover for F-35 maturation process working out "all" its kinks. A decision needs to be made in 2016 whether or not to restart the F-22 production. 

If or when any production starts, it will transfer a cost to the F-35 program through the number of its own units built. It was once conceived that 3,000 F-35's would be built during its life cycle. That unit number has dropped as cost on its development have increased. The pentagon and congress will have to come to terms soon how they will manage two projects and maintain effective levels for the F-35's development. 

The answer is simple, for every F-22 built, one F-35 will be struck from its production run. Since every F-22 built is very capable of replacing a one for one F-35 struck from production, the Air Force will maintain its over-all capability. If building only two hundred more F-22's, then there will be 200 less F-35 built over its program life. The only detrimental caveat is the cost of production ramp-up for the F-22 is very expensive. That costs may reduce total F-35 units even more by reducing its air wings size more than planned. 

If the US is planning a Generation 6 JSF, then it makes sense to cap the F-35 force to a significant number such as 1,800 having another two hundred F-22's at its flanks making the composite force of F-22's and F-35's equaling about 2,200 aircraft in the US Air Force.  Counting F-15, F-16 and FA-18 retirements, provides for smooth transition which can be accomplished during both production runs as the F-22 enhances the F-35 better than any of its predecessors are capable of complimenting. The F-22 is significantly better than any of the aforementioned Gen 4 aircraft that are aging rapidly. Making more F-22's is the bridge to the F-35 dominant role, it will play over the next 50 years. Perhaps in another 20 years there will be enough Trillions for adding additional Air Force aircraft for the world security objectives.


Friday, May 27, 2016

Since December 2011 The 737 Order Book Grows

Starting with SWA anchor order in December 2011 for 150 Max and ending with an order chart through April 2016. A summary view not including one hundred Vietjet 737's or eight Norwegian 737's, shows a robust Boeing order book for its single aisle first four months during this year. In fact, 2016 may surpass Airbus single aisle order count for the year. Knowing that Airbus prefers sandbagging order announcements for airshows, a steady pace has been established by Boeing for its single aisle offerings. The Neo-Max gap continues to shrink. The game change could occur, once the first Max delivers while falling into customer hands when comparing the Airbus A320 offering having a rough first delivery.

Single aisle by the numbers:

  • Max Ordered since          2011-December: 3,090
  • NG Ordered since            2011-December: 1,356
  • Military Ordered since      2011-December:      79
  • Other 737 Ordered since  2011-December:        8

                                                 
                                                  Total      4,532

Starting with January 2012, the time represents just over four years and 4 months or about 52 a month backlog build for the 737 family of aircraft. Dividing 4,532 by 52 months a straight line order rate can be established of 87 units ordered a month worldwide since the first Max order.

An Airbus snap shop since January 2016 shows a single aisle order pacing for only fourteen A320 NEO's. This falls well below Boeing's 2016 order pacing for the first four months as it totals 35 single aisle booked per month. Adding Boeing's May order count of 108 737 (to date) would increase its order pace up to 50 from 35 single aisle per month during 2016. 

Having a pace of 87 orders a month on average since 2012, the current 2016 total for Boeing of 249 is well below the last four years pace where the total units ordered should be about 348 units booked, if it were maintaining its four year pace.

Even though this is an off order year for both giants I would expect Boeing to outpace the single aisle production with its orders through December 2016.


Monday, May 23, 2016

VietJet Has Ordered Up With Boeing

Counting 100 single aisle Max 8-200C's as an opening headline is a considerable boost for the VietJet Airline and its airplane maker, Boeing, with its aspirations in the East Asia's market.


Not wanting to go on about the deal it is apparent Boeing is busy in the region making significant headway with Vietnam's other commercial carrier, This order is for VietJet and not its own Vietnam Airlines, who currently and already has booked both the Boeing 787 (19) and the Airbus A350 (14) aircraft in a prior significant order. The region will explode with Boeing aircraft having the 100 Max 200C's on order. This is the same type Ryan Air (Ireland) ordered a few years back when it  required a stretch version of the 737 Max 8 and Boeing accommodated it with a 197 seat Max 8 with additional doors and a modified galley. Now VietJet’s order solidified the model production for Boeing.


Saturday, May 21, 2016

The Ever Important Boeing 777X Wing Center Opens

Boeing has now opened its newest building for business. The 777X wing center built on the massive 777 campus adjacent to the 777X future assembly building.

Boeing Opens 777X Wing Center


The Boeing 777X Composite Wing Center covers more than 27 acres under one roof. (Photo: Boeing)

This now starts the race to first flight.

Friday, May 20, 2016

Today Is National Zumwalt Day: It Delivered!

DDG 1000 delivered today after 4.4 billion was spent and follow-on Billions will be spent pushing forward a Navy dream of Oceanic dominance protecting US interest, allies, and it defense of America. What can the DDG do is the big mystery? So far it has shown it can go stealthy, run fast, and mess with any electronic warfare imposed on the ship. It can light up a small city with its gas turbines generation. 

Navy photograph

DDG1000 US Navy Photo

What is proposed for the DDG 1000 while in San Diego during 2017?

·      Complete ship’s array of weapons (known/unknown)
·      Install war fighting capabilities (unknown)
·      Test in secret operational capability (Unknown)
·      Complete training of war fighting crew (about 140 members)

The 33+ knot and 16,000 ton Zumwalt is something not to criticize as another DoD expenditure that is flawed. It’s the pride of Bath Iron Works and Raytheon Technology. All systems will be go in 2018. It will turn lose a capability, the Arleigh Burke class of destroyer cannot not match. The DDG 51 series is a twentieth century tool of defense from the 1990's. This destroyer, who can't be found easily, and does not yet have installed its full lethal function will change geopolitical aspirations. First assignment maybe the South China seas where China is building military sand castles in the sea region of multiple nations.  China is imposing its will and the US has a ship China can't build at this time.

Winging It solutes the people of Bath Iron Works and the US Navy having made this day possible. It’s the first of a family of three, but once accomplished the added value will be more follow-on Zumwalt types as a repayment for billions invested. 


Thursday, May 19, 2016

Ruili Orders Six 787-9's

Boeing, who is stuck in a ordering down cycle, does a pick six 787-9's from Ruili, a Chinese airlines expanding its footprint going forward. This year, in particularly is noted as a "order pause year" for Boeing citing low fuel costs and customer's solid fleet inventory as a reason for the 2016 pause. Airbus also has had a slow order start, thus making any order binges "so last year". This period sets up as an airshow dependent year for order announcements. 

Ruili 737 in action



The airshow grows in importance when Boeing or Airbus tents have something to say at the shows. Even though Boeing holds this year’s order lead during the first half of 2016, an airshow may change whose doing what to whom. My own order predictions are out the window as the makers are shaking the order tree for any ripe commitments.  Any prediction will be coming from the airplane makers themselves born out of hopefulness from a friendly customer. The other side of the order business is hanging onto any orders placed prior to 2016, and preventing cancellations. This year remains prone to order cancellations in the wide body arena.
The economy is not the culprit for airline ordering malaise, but underlying factors contribute to the order pause such as competitive risks. Opening a new route with its current aircraft inventory is a risk when the competitive margins are slim going into a new market served by another airline. Buying new aircraft for such a market is a greater risk. An expanding airline such as Ruili may hesitate investing with new equipment when they have older. However, in Ruili's case they have a small inventory to begin with including any wide bodied aircraft. Summarily, all Chinese based airlines are strictly given oversight by its government and its respective fleet expansion mode. Making Ruili's order transaction an accomplishment for Boeing completing the deal.

This does indicate the condition of the world airline market where special situations makes the order during 2016. The remainder of the year should see sales with customers who have rendered down to a decision point, where risk taking becomes the higher priority for its business model, rather than waiting for all the tea leaves to line up before ordering. The six Ruili 787-9's is a big deal in today's market.