My Blog List

Sunday, August 2, 2015

Its The passenger Size "Stupid"

The long discussed topic about airline seats has missed the over-arching point. It’s the passenger size stupid. Going to the demographic chart will quickly make the point. It also makes the point for purchasing which airplane makes the best sense. The average Canadian woman: Example 

1.                 153 pounds
2.    Canada: The average Canadian woman's weight is 153 pounds (69.4 kg) and height is 5' 3.4" (161 cm). Her male counterpart weighs 182 pounds (82.7 kg), and is 5' 8.5" (174 cm) tall.Dec 4, 2006.



USA Today:

USA Women


                 


                 
                USA Men




http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

Data
Weight
Height
Weight
Height
http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

1988 - 1994
152 lb
69 kg
5' 3.7"
162 cm

180
82
5' 9.1"
176 cm
http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

1999 - 2000
163 lb
74 kg
5' 3.8"
163 cm

190
86
5' 9.3"
176 cm
http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif


http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

Canadian Women

Canadian Men
http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

Data
Weight
Height
Weight
Height
http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/ipr/grey.gif

2005
153 lb
69 kg
5' 3.4"
161 cm

182
83
5' 8.5"
174 cm





Wiki
By region
Region
Adult population (millions)
Average weight
Asia
2,815
57.7 kg (127.2 lb)
Europe
606
70.8 kg (156.1 lb)
Latin America and the Caribbean
386
67.9 kg (149.7 lb)
North America
263
80.7 kg (177.9 lb)


The XWB body A-350-9 looses it talking point by the time it lands in Japan. The best option becomes the 787-9 for all operations in the Orient. The human weight and dimension factors are considered for each market. Then comes the configuration metric for the airplane. The majority of the world is not North America. Boeing has long designed its 787 towards the majority in spite of the of the Airbus XWB moniker. Efficiency blended with passenger amenity is what Boeing sought for its original design. Airbus may have opted going five inches wider more for its own manufacturing convenience than passenger sentiment.


No comments:

Post a Comment