How Long Is The 797 Vision?

The 797 idea may have started before the 757 stopped productions during the year 2004.  Boeing shelved the middle of the market concept when there was no 757 replacement revealed to the public. It had its hands full with the 787 and other models of 777 and the Max. It was a running battle with Airbus and airplane supremacy. The time has come where years of engineering with other programs and the now apparent 797 program has occurred.  It was stated by another aviation journalist that it takes 10 years to build a clean sheet design before it is delivered. Counting back fourteen years may have signaled a back room engineering design had already hatched for a 797. It depended on the 787, and the 737 Max to make it happen.

A 797 has been a WIP for at least five years as it gathers technology developed by all Boeing's commercial aviation programs. Its been the last three years Boeing has consulted with its customers for the perfect NMA that would fill a 4,000 plane gap between the Max and the 787. Ten years may be a correct estimation for a clean sheet and Boeing has already checked off many of those years pondering its NMA program. It has reached the point of just freezing the concept and announcing the launch customers.  Boeing is further down the launch road than pundits may like to think out of some deduction and logic.

A 797 launch is going to happen sooner rather than later. It has unused plant space or property space for building an immense 797 facility. It makes sense to move the Everett 787  production to its own sole source facility in Charleston, SC. The SC facility can build all the 787 types by expanding on its vast acreage, at that site with more cement and steel buildings erected. The supplier system is in place in SC and Boeing has proven it can build production space very quickly, as in under 18 months. 

The 797 Jumpstart will occur in the Northwest as the 797 is refined into a flying copy while additional 787 production comes with building all the 787's at Boeing's Charleston, SC site. It can and it will deliver 14 787's a month from that site. It has already proven the low country can do what it is tasked to do.

However, Boeing-Everett is up to designing, testing, and building the 797 under a very close watch from its expert engineers who are experienced in the new plane programs. A natural logic would be for having the 777X, 747F, and 767F-Military all occur in Everett, WA. The 797 could and will fit in the production within this Northwest location. It's a natural decision to fold in the 797 on its available floor space since it became open when surge lines evaporated and other programs wound down. 

Boeing has space and has very capable people anchored in the Northwest to do this program starting from its already and current three-year-old design points, reducing its ten years required for a first delivery clean sheet down to seven years, and ending with first delivery in 2025. 

Boeing doesn't have to retest the copyrighted technologies it developed over the last 15 years. It only has to integrate those technologies into the 797. It is what Boeing already has available without using risky testing processes or using any untested assumptions since those technologies were already de-risked from all other programs mentioned from Boeing's family of aircraft.

The unknown 797 engine program is the NMA's biggest hurdle and it seems logic will put Boeing into accepting a 50,000 thrust engine from GE/Safran as its sole 797 source engine offering. Boeing would not improve its market with a dual engine maker choice for its customers. The 797 stands alone and an Airbus counter would most likely be developing an A321 off-shoot with A Rolls Royce engine at the forefront. 

The development engine time at this point from a clean sheet is about five years. The Boeing engine supplier has been working on an engine concept over the last three years. At a launch customers announcement, an offered engine will already have thousands of hours run through its casings.

Boeing Beats Airbus YTD, by 3-1 After May Count Totals

Total order numbers reach a net 306 orders for Boeing's as of May 31, 2018 date as compared to the Airbus tally of 111 units. This is almost a Boeing 3-1 order lead before Farnborough Airshow the chart below recaps Boeings month and YTD totals. The month reported 43 net orders added during May. The big number was the 787-9 and 787-8 orders for a net number of 10 -9's and 2  -8's bringing the 787 net total to 83 for its YTD number.

Rolls Royce Package "B" Is Sent To Detention With Package "C"

Rolls Royce is having one of those years. First its 787 engine Trent 1000 Package "C" started disintegrating its fan blades, then came an inner compressor flaw and now 166 of its Boeing Trent 1000, Package "B", engines have been flagged and will be sent to the penalty box until further notice. 

The Winging Tally shows Rolls Royce has its engines on 273 787's or times two it has delivered  546 engines to its Boeing customers. Package "B" engine review equals 166 as mentioned above. It was reported that Rolls Royce has 380 affected engines for inspection delivered to 787 customers. In total the affected Rolls Royce engines now tally 546 engines under review or needs fixing.  These numbers don't include spares but do address units flying with paying customers. Otherwise, the whole lot of 787 Rolls Royce Trent Engines are now under a review or needs immediate fixing. The FAA has restricted the 787 with Rolls Royce Package "C" from flying 140 minutes away from an airport. The ultimate and prior rating was for 330 minutes from any applicable airport, The 2 hour and 20-minute flying window hobbles Rolls Royce customers to lease older airframes or models as a fill-in while the 787-Rolls remains grounded or under a mechanical fix process. 

The company just announced a 10% across the board lay-off of employees while it halts certain field and production operations until a resolution is completed. A speculation is that Rolls was chasing the GE engine performance and it pushed through solutions within its jet engineering that failed to hold up during airline operations. It also may end up making the Dreamliner a one engine aircraft if Rolls doesn't solve its current engine crises.  A situation GE would love to address with Rolls Royce customers having Dreamliners.

FYI:

Is it possible to re-engine aircraft with different engine options?

The two different engine models compatible with the 787 use a standard electrical interface to allow an aircraft to be fitted with either Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 or General Electric GEnx engines. This interchangeability aims to save time and cost when changing engine types; while the previous aircraft could exchange engines for those of a different manufacturer, the high cost and time required made it rare.

The benefit of interchangeability makes leasing aircraft easier for the lessor, as their fleet would be compatible with all the airlines and their existing facilities.

Denver Mile High Will Go to 150 Gates

It already has 6 long runways. The lengths of 12,000 ft or 16,000 are immense. It is known that Denver could double its runways to 12 if required. By 2021, it could handle a mass aviation exodus from the eastern part of this nation. The addition of 39 new gates was reported by AirlineRatings. 

That means, when completed, in the next three years, Denver could handle another 39 flights every hour for taking-off or landing while bringing the total gates capacity to 150. If an airplane holds 200 passengers, then every hour could see a 30K passenger exchange. 

Immense came to mind, but other insidious thoughts float to the top of my head. In a time of war, Denver is known as the DC of the west. The rocky mountain front holds vast underground facilities only a 30-mile shot from Denver International Airport. Of course, that could transport 30,000 people via interstate or the rumored underground rail system to the Rocky Mountain front. Most of DIA terminals have rail connections in its terminal basements. 

Some tracks lead into cement doors and nobody knows where those lead. Riding a "passenger car" to the terminal of your destination and looking out its window, one can see those track spurs to nowhere. I have and have wondered what's up with that?

Going to internet rumor sites concludes it's not a good idea to investigate too far into your imagination without a good exit plan. However, 39 new gates and the possibility for another 6 runways makes one wonder a lot. 

The situation room is rendered on DIA's massive murals when walking unescorted through the terminals. The tent-like architecture speaks of a nomadic center for people wanting to become lost.

Airbus (May's) Net Order Numbers Lag Boeing's April

Airbus has 111 net orders for 2018. It is in a real dogfight for order supremacy with Boeing during 2018. Single-aisle is 108 and Widebody class is a net 3 orders for 2018. Farnsborough is coming in July and it could all change. The lead could increase for Boeing.

Airbus Widebody thru May 2018 Net Orders

The GAO-18-321 F-35 Fix It !!! Report

“No more bullets” are required by the GAO on the F-35 program. Elmer Fudd says has 111 class I deficiencies of which 47 are under the hood fixing at this time but that’s a lot of untouched class I’s. It also has about 855 class II’s fix it before the 2019 full rate production deadlines are reached. Or it’s a fix it before you buy it call-out.

No more money unless it is fixed says the GAO. 

Here is the summary F-35 GAO Sh** list

Fuel Prices Driving The Airline Business In "The Blue" Period.

An eye trained on the rearview mirror is watching aviation fuel prices going upward. Many years ago (2014) the axiom was established, "The lower the price of crude oil the older the airplane in your fleet is best". In fact, many airline fleets sought after the used airplane market for a lower purchase price thus allowing for a greater fuel burn when Jet A was cheaper.

It was fashionable for airlines to go after inventory from lessors or others who were seeking to unload old inventory to anyone with a fat checkbook. So the axiom grew out of opportunity and Boeing suffered additional sales loss for its super-efficient 787 products due to low fuel prices. In fact, airline fleets had to dust off its opportunity math models considering cash flows and profits while operating older equipment versus buying more expensive equipment like the 787.

Recently it was said by Randy Tinseth, Boeing’s vice president of marketing, 

"Aircraft replacement makes sense for airlines when oil reaches $65 a barrel." 

As of Tuesday morning, the price per barrel of Brent Crude was more than $74.

That all being true, a pent-up energy has grown from old equipment getting older while ignoring efficiency becomes the ban of having higher fuel prices. I'll call the high price of crude the "Blue period", signaling a market shift from having old airframes to having more expensive and efficient new aircraft. The factors to consider is the savings obtained from a more efficient aircraft burning less fuel as compared with an older aircraft burning more fuel. At this time it could be up to 25% fuel volume savings using higher priced fuel. Or a 30% maintenance improvement 

Cash flow models are humming away in some computer under a desk supporting a huge screen for office meetings. The old fuel model may have had $1.99 per gallon fuel price. The new model may have a $3.99 a gallon price for Jet A, worldwide. The old (767-300) aircraft burning 12,000 gallons, going far, with full fuel load will compete against an efficient model that burns 3,000 gallons less than an older aircraft on the same route. At a $2.00 a gallon price variance from old to new fuel price, the new having a 3,000-gallon advantage, therefore, saves an airline $6,000 a trip not counting the new technology maintenance savings found on the ground, or in the avionics. The savings could easily reach a $10,000 in savings going long one-way.

Buying new equipment may make more money than hanging onto older and cheaper equipment if fuel prices rise higher than $65 per barrel of crude oil. The financial performance models in an office building near an airport may scream, " buy new equipment" such as Randy Tinseth suggests in above comment.

Old equipment has the following conditions:

·      Lower capital (purchase price)

·      Lower interest costs (loan costs)

·      Higher maintenance cost per trip

Naming a few 787 costs conditions:

·      Higher Capital outlay (purchase)

·      Higher interest costs (loan costs)

·      Lower Maintenance expense

·      Lower Fuel Costs

·      More efficient operational functions (such as onboard smart routing tools)

If a new 787 goes 500 trips a year saving fuel costs over old equipment then it may save $1.2 million a year in operational costs which would contribute towards an advantage over buying old equipment flying on cheaper fuel which no longer exists at this time. Randy Tinseth, stated an obvious market condition. Airlines will have to buy new equipment sooner which is better than later as fuel prices rise.

The Airbus A-330 Program Has Some Concerns

Its an A-330 market crumble. They had customers but few in number relative to the few orders received. In fact, the A-330 book stood at 300 units in its backlog after Hawaii canceled its batch with Airbus. Then the Iran deal and Trump closed off another 32 A-330 NEO 900's and another 4 of its CEO A-330-200s. Out of 36 A-330 booked it will have snuck two units out for delivery to Iran before the embargo began.

If Airbus makes fifty A-330's a year with this standing order book the program closes its doors in four years provided it gains more orders and doesn't lose any more orders. The pinnacle moment was when the Iran deal closed out 34 orders already booked by Airbus. Dropping those dead orders lowers the 300 unit cushion it had made down to 266 units for filling until its end. The notion Airbus will sustain this program by selling hundreds of A-330 in future years becomes a risky notion. 

More customer may convert orders over to Boeing if it announces its own NMA this year. The A-330 has had only one order in the first four months of 2018 which signals an ailing program unless Airbus has more bookings yet announced or unrevealed during the month of May.

Airbus cannot withstand a sub 50 unit order year for the A-330. A  trend has started with Boeing as it low balls its 787 fleet offerings against anything Airbus offers. If the current market trends are maintained for another several years, then the A-330 NEO program becomes a big Airbus failure.  

What Has The 787 Accomplished For Boeing

The market is important, so much so it drives decisions and those decisions drive the stock and Boeing's stock is riding high. Having said that, the long ago Boeing strategy came before the 787 even before it flew its first flight. Boeing devoted so much of its resources to its strategy, it forgot about its single-aisle 737. Airbus did what it could and it worked well. The A-320 and A-330 took off. The first order of widebody business was to stop the A-330 bleeding of the 767 program. Hence the 787, was a necessary evil of capital expenditure. Boeing's secret technology was cash and it spent like it was the holder of the world's currency. Even before it was a Trump idea, it was a Boeing strategy of spending the dollar on the 787 program.

·      Build something Airbus couldn't match

·      Bracket the widebody market

·      Kill off Airbus Programs one by one

·      Nullify Airbus Strategy

Boeing began building something Airbus couldn't copy, the 787. The family had two big goals.

·      Unify all Boeing programs under the 787 common denominator thus making those aircraft a commonality of excellence the Boeing denominator as well.

·      Bracket Airbus programs into submission such as the Airbus two family members, the A-350, and the dying A-380.

The A-350 and A330 are losing the 787 order war. The A380 is in the aviation morgue but not yet buried. Boeing is seeking the 797 dual aisles offering to kill off the A-321NEO.  

The Airbus strategy is close to being nullified as it cannot answer all Boeings offering at once. It took Boeing 15 years to get to this point with the 787 being the center point. In five year Airbus will become like its A380 program, order less.

Boeing had a hole in its strategy which it is now just addressing. What to do with the A-321 success and its place disrupting the Boeing bracketing campaign?

Now the A-330 program is withering under the 787 weight. Recently, Hawaiian Airlines switch out an A-330 longstanding order changing it to the 787. American Airlines ordered billions of 787 totaling 47 of its type. Today, in India, it finalizes an outstanding negotiation with Vistara, a Singapore Airline affiliate for about 10 787’s instead of going with A-330’s. Recent news stories display a daily erosion of Airbus confidence from the 787 onslaughts.

The A-350 and A330 are losing the 787 order war. The A380 is in the aviation morgue but not yet buried. Boeing is seeking the 797 dual aisles offering to kill off the A-321NEO. It’s a one by one snipper targeting onslaught conceived before 2005 to piece out the Airbus idea with devastation, which is just now appearing to work its way through the Airbus programs. The Airbus strategy is close to being nullified as it cannot answer Boeings offering all at once. It took Boeing 15 years to get to this point with the 787 being the center point. In five year Airbus will become like its own A380 program, order-less!

The A-350 doesn't match the 787 in its market while the Airbus  A-350-1000 or A-380 won't match the 777X in its up and coming market segment.

Boeing has built everything emanating out of the quantum 787 techno leap as it has put all its eggs into its sea change during the last 15-20 years, and now comes the 797, after that, a future single-aisle which should finish this Boeing aviation campaign with Airbus.

Disrupt: The 2018 Aviation Word Of The Year

Often it has been stated during 2018 a new airplane model or business plan will disrupt the market. The play word "disrupt" is often used in aviation journals as if somehow it will bring readers to an understanding of that word in the aviation world. The verb tense begins with its variation which becomes disruptive in itself.

Disrupt:

Interrupt (an event, activity, or process) by causing a disturbance or problem.

"a rail strike that could disrupt both passenger and freight service"

synonyms: throw into confusion, throw into disorder, throw into disarray, cause confusion/turmoil in, play havoc with; Disruptive Technology-Aviation: In business, a Disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a new market and value network and eventually disrupts an existing market and value network, displacing established market-leading firms, products, and alliances.  The 2018 Aviation Word of the year is... "Disruptive"

From the 787 to the A-350ULR, airplane makers are trying its best to be disruptive. The airline customer is also disruptive by employing those makers innovations and technologies within the customer's marketplace. Before the 777X even flies, it hopes to disrupt the A-380 and the A-350ULR out of the Airbus production line. At this time it remains to the 787 and 777-300ER for disrupting the Airbus line of aircraft. The futuristic 797 proposal hopes to disrupt the A-321. The Max hopes to disrupt the A320NEO and so forth.

Airlines hope to disrupt other airlines with innovative routes and destination pairings. Airlines will use whatever means available for conquering the market. Even Singapore will fly its newly delivered A-350ULR  9,000 miles in a market disruption movement. Having only 162 passengers on board any of its ULR flights for 19 hours is a tough payday. Other airlines may counter with a one-stop offering by stopping over at a glamorous setting for anything over 14 hours in the air. It may even pay for the customer's room and ground transportation within the stop-over confines. However it is presented, the goal is to become disruptive to its competition.