The two plants in Charleston, SC and Everett WA, can get the job done without Everett's extra surge line. Exceeding expectations by months, as Boeing originally predicted a 2016 date, Boeing will move in the 777X project into the Everett 787 surge line space after the end of 2015.
This is a solid announcement, and the planning calendar should not change. Charlotte has turned around its production acumen for the 787, and is targeted with 4-5 787's a month by years end. Thus ending Everett's 787 surge line. Everett will continue it's pace of six 787 a month. Eventually, Charlotte will achieve about 6, 787 a month, making the completion goal for its contribution towards Boeing's stated 2016 goal of 12 787 a month.
Charlotte, SC will specialize in the 787-10 production due to an awkward, transportation of its longer barrel required for the 787-10's. This barrel size makes it not feasible for any Everett 787-10 production desires. It makes it so much more efficient for staying home in the low country keeping the longer barrel for Charlotte's aspirations.
The Charlotte 787 production learning curve reaches maturity by the end of 2015 while the other facility (Everett) starts 777X production and takes on 777X floor modifications in the former 787 surge line area.
The 787-10 step-up, will be Charlotte's first solo effort after Boeing goes outside the former Everett only development facility, where it had processed the 787-8 and 787-9 as first builds and testing of the sibling aircraft. The year 2016 will be the Boeing South matriculation ceremony in the Charlotte, SC plant. They have previously built a production 787-9 with success, and now they will build the 787-10 out of whole cloth and probably will fly it back to Everett during a complete flight testing regimen. It should eventually fly north to Everett for further testing, where they have the extensive testing data, collection and expertise available.
All of this can only happen because Boeing South has emerged as a competent and efficient facility. It looks like Boeing's gamble paid off going South, which bodes well for the low country and giving Everett more flexibility with the 777X project. All of this sets up for the 230th decade since counting began.
In the year 2030 everyone expects another Sea Change in aviation. The 777X will probably go plastic with the newest GE engines having all composite internals. An enormous Boeing blended wing could replace the A-380. By then, the 737 MAX is a now a twenty year place holder in single aisle category, where it will go futuristic with a composite make-over in 2030. Finally, the 787, is hard to replace, but three decades of service gives the 787 all the advantages of scientific advances. It will emerge as the ultimate airline with its composite barrel design and all electric architecture made better.
My Blog List
Saturday, May 9, 2015
Friday, May 8, 2015
A Bloggers Find: The 777X Introduction
Winging it desires to bring this Article to its reader attention
by re-posting the below article from the
First Boeing 777X tipped
for 2018
By David Flynn Filed
under: Boeing 777, Boeing
777X
The first Boeing 777X will trundle off the production line in
2018, a Boeing exec has revealed, as the airline edges closer to commercial
flights of the new long-range jets from 2020.
That debutante is likely to be the Boeing 777-9X, although the X
will be dropped as the plane makes its journey from blueprint to blue skies, to
become the 777-9.
It will be followed by the smaller but longer-range Boeing
777-8X, or 777-8 (note the nod to the naming conventions adopted for the
Boeing 787 Dreamliner).
Bob Feldmann, Boeing's vice president for the 777X project,
told The Seattle Times that the first 777X will
roll off an early production line – one currently used to ramp up Boeing 787
production – in 2018.
Boeing is on track on finalize the 777X's design configuration
later this year. "It’s an exciting time as we begin to define the
world’s next great airplane" Feldman says.
The manufacturer has already notched up orders for 286 of
the 777X jets, with the lion's share going to 777 stalwart Emirates in 35 of
the 777-8s and 115 of the 777-9s.
Gulf neighbor and rival Etihad has inked a deal for 8 777-8s and
17 777-9s.
Qatar Airways, Cathay Pacific, Lufthansa and ANA have all
opted for the larger 777-9 alone with orders.
The X factor
The latest addition to Boeing's best-selling 777 family,
the 777X is being spruiked as "the largest and most efficient
twin-engine commercial jet in the world, with the lowest operating cost per
seat of any commercial airplane."
The 777-9X is spec'd for 400 passengers in a three-class
cabin layout with a peak range nudging past 15,185km (8,200 nautical
miles).
The 777-8X will trim the seat count to 350 passengers but
with a maximum range over 17,220km (9,300 nautical miles).
In both cases, improved design and new-generation engines will
see the planes burn less fuel than today's 777s.
Long wings for the win
Part of that advanced design: sweeping wings made
from carbon-fibre composites rather than metal, which span 235
feet (71.6 meters) to boost aerodynamic efficiency.
However, the tips of those wings will fold up when the 777X is
on the ground to reduce the wingspan by some 7 metres (23 feet).
These 'swingtips', as Boeing calls them, are required to
make the 777X fit into airport boarding gates and taxiways designed for the
other members of the 777 family rather than demand expensive airport
modifications.
(It's not exactly a new idea: Boeing patented it in 1995
for the original Boeing 777, and while no airline ever ticked this option box
on their order, a full-scale model of the folding wingtip is on display at
Boeing's Museum of Flight in Seattle.)
Inside the Boeing 777X
Boeing will also adapt key aspects of its 787 Dreamliner series
to shape the passenger experience of the 777X.
The 777X will include a lower effective cabin altitude of
6,000 feet; oversized windows set higher into the cabin; and what Boeing
promises will be "economy class seat widths up to 18 inches
wide," although the choice of configurations and seat widths will in
the end fall to airlines buying the big bird.
The rest of the creature comforts which Boeing has in mind for
the 777X – which is slated to begin production in 2017, with first
commercial flights from 2020 – are a mash-up of the Boeing 777 family interior
with the 787's cabin innovations.
For starters the cabin altitude will be pegged at 6,000
feet and humidity levels boosted, with both traits being "comparable to
the 787 Dreamliner" in order to reduce the effects of inflight fatigue and
jetlag.
Also like the Dreamliner, the enlarged windows of the 777X
will be positioned higher on the fuselage so they're at eye level for a
larger percentage of passengers, to allow more light into the cabin and a sense
that there's an 'outside' out there from even the dreaded middle seats.
There should be lower cabin noise thanks to new engine nacelle design, better cabin insulation and even the installation of twice as many air nozzles which will funnel triple-filtered air at reduced velocity for less noise.
Boeing also says the 777X will introduce an "all-new
interior design that allows airlines to customise their cabin architectures by
class."
"This innovation includes an adaptable suite of parts that
facilitates choices in overhead ceiling and stow bin configurations, allowing
airlines to create the feeling of separate and distinct cabins that meet both
airline and passenger needs."
Boeing suggests this as a possible high-tech 777X cabin, perhaps
assuming that Tron Airlines is the launch customer...
Of course, no modern jet can get by without LED mood lighting,
so that's a given right out of the box.
"The 777X will redefine the total passenger
experience" promises Dennis Eng, Boeing's Director for 777X
Interiors.
"All of the interior features we are exploring and
designing into the new airplane are working together as a package to create an
exciting new passenger experience."
The 737 CFM Leap-1B Is under The Boeing Wing (Updated)
The infamous CFM-International Leap-1B is
currently under a 747 wing at the start of its extensive testing. What gave its
infamy is the 5% performance shortfall on the bench testing recently, which
causes major concerns for the program when competing with the Airbus A-320 NEO.
Boeing has already sold 2,724 Max to customers with this one only engine type.
Boeing placed all its eggs in the CFM basket, as it has done for the 737 since
these many years it has been flying.
The next two years testing by both CFM and
Boeing must improve the newly conceived engine by the 5% short fall. Heat
mitigation design points, and internal inefficiencies are two areas under the
engine builders’ scrutiny while it flies attached to the 747-400 test bed. Both
Boeing and CFM have to make up the inefficiency metric within its 69.4"
diameter. The fixed 737 engine opening is at maximum, negating any expansion of
diameter compared with a similar engine found on the A-320 NEO's CFM Leap 1-A,
78" engine diameter. The "efficiency rule of thumb", suggest a
bigger diameter for better performance through aerodynamic attributes. Where
the additional space gives a natural and better performance with additional
mechanical space. A tighter engine makes for a hotter engines losing some performance.
The NEO CFM Leap 1-A engine has a 2% shortfall at this time at its
78" diameter. Boeing's tighter Leap 1-B must find ways for an additional
5% improvement during the time it sits attached under the 747 testing wing.
Several publication have suggested new ceramics for dissipating
and withstanding heat build-up as one area CFM must achieve a percentage
improvement. A combination of tuning the new engine through compression ratios,
and engine parts modifications can go only so far when installing PIP's (Performance
improvement package) derivatives. Typically a PIP cycle takes vast amount of
time for implementation. The CFM Leap 1-B could be making at least two PIP's to
improve the engine performance up to 5% from its bench test metric. CFM has
these two years of flying test to do it in. How they can do it? Obviously
through maximizing its every aspect of thermodynamic testing on composite parts
and reconfiguration for the mechanical optimization of this jet engine. CFM has
to stay within the lines of a 69.4" diameter. CFM can't cheat the diameter
upward by making the 737 Max engine a larger opening, as found on the 777X when
it meets engine efficiency targets. Boeing sold the Max to its customers on the
premise it will achieve its "established" on paper "bench
marks" for efficiency during the MAX project.
Both Boeing and CFM are searching for percentage points in
multiple areas rather than just one area.
Here are the key areas they need to find percentage point
improvement.
- Engine Weight
Reduction by a slight amount.
- Advanced Heat
resistant & ceramic-plastic parts over the current parts installation.
- Optimal engine
placement on wing moving it frontward or backward by a few mm's or cm's.
- Tweaking
compression by-pass metrics
- Boeing helps
with airplane design aerodynamics and airplane weight.
Any combination of these areas receiving a measurable testing
improvements, will come off the bench, and is frozen as a test PIP. Then it's
placed under -the-wing as test copy on the 747 Boeing aircraft, for actual
en-flight testing.
CFM/Boeing have two years to make up this short fall by method
testing each objective area.
Recent news reports show promising results: Air wise Report Link
Below
"Separately, a senior industry figure familiar with the LEAP engine described the shortfall speculation as "absolutely false." Another industry insider familiar with the matter said talk of a shortfall was inaccurate."
The Airbus Leap 1-A with its 2% short fall has different testing
constraints from its bigger diameter engine. They have an easier road to go
where any improvement can be passed through for consideration on the 1-B.
However, since Boeing needs innovation in more areas, and since the 1-B is constrained
by 69.4", its innovation may not be transferable to the 1-A scenario.
Before Max
MAX Trickeration
Photo From Aviation Week
Boeing's trickle down design
problem starts with aircraft landing clearance and its landing gear. It would
have to redesign the whole frame for accommodating a taller gear folding into
the body. Next would be a push back on all engineering space available in the
aircraft. The argument for a clean sheet design would be made by having a
taller landing gears for its bigger engine opening. Boeing chose to improve the
737 by a giant "Leap" step, and not change the frame configuration by doing
so.
The CFM 1-B is confined by ground
clearance since its using 737 NG configuration theme of a low- to - the -
ground engine placement. The question remains, will they do it?
My answer, is sort of and very
close:
The engine can better itself by
3% as an instinctive estimation for CFM improvement. Boeing will chip in
another 1% for its part with Aero design trimmings when the MAX flies. With a
"Test PIP II" and a Boeing effort in total, will make the 4%+ offset the 5% lost indicated during its first and formal bench tests. Customers will be satisfied, since it
will achieve an advantage over the competition (A-320) with a significant
efficiency separation over the the CFM Leap 1-A hung on the A-320 NEO.
Maybe the 5% shortfall is a false flag operation for Airbus' sake.
A Winging It Follow-up has found CFM, also had placed a loosely fitting 1B engine on the bench representing what a worn out 1B would simulate after approximately five years of service. Having observed this important fact, I can take several conclusions on this new knowledge.
1. Having a loose engine tolerance will significantly under perform expectations found in a new engine delivered with factory tight tolerances. CFM knew this would be an outcome from this test but it didn't know by how much. The one formally tested, was a under performing engine configuration representing what a customer may expect from an engine at the end of its life cycle.
2. Finally, lessons learned from airborne 747 testing, will include significant changes optimizing the CFM-1B configured engine, in addition with Boeing's own aero packaged, improvements mating the the 1B engine nacelle with 737 Max body dynamics, optimize a more efficient body enhancements with new lift and drag coefficients saving fuel and workload for the engine
The claim by others who became a town cryer for a 1B -5% shortfall were only correct within limited facts about the test, and have greatly underestimated what the 1B will demonstrate on the first 737 Max in flight testing. Indeed it should meet the high expectations mapped at the beginning of this program, a 14% improvement over older 737 single aisle models. Airbus has much to be alarmed with when the situation of the block tests is exposed. Those on the project cannot say out of confidentiality, but can smile at the hubris of a -5% shortfall report.
A Winging It Follow-up has found CFM, also had placed a loosely fitting 1B engine on the bench representing what a worn out 1B would simulate after approximately five years of service. Having observed this important fact, I can take several conclusions on this new knowledge.
1. Having a loose engine tolerance will significantly under perform expectations found in a new engine delivered with factory tight tolerances. CFM knew this would be an outcome from this test but it didn't know by how much. The one formally tested, was a under performing engine configuration representing what a customer may expect from an engine at the end of its life cycle.
2. Finally, lessons learned from airborne 747 testing, will include significant changes optimizing the CFM-1B configured engine, in addition with Boeing's own aero packaged, improvements mating the the 1B engine nacelle with 737 Max body dynamics, optimize a more efficient body enhancements with new lift and drag coefficients saving fuel and workload for the engine
The claim by others who became a town cryer for a 1B -5% shortfall were only correct within limited facts about the test, and have greatly underestimated what the 1B will demonstrate on the first 737 Max in flight testing. Indeed it should meet the high expectations mapped at the beginning of this program, a 14% improvement over older 737 single aisle models. Airbus has much to be alarmed with when the situation of the block tests is exposed. Those on the project cannot say out of confidentiality, but can smile at the hubris of a -5% shortfall report.
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Qatar Quips About The A-350 Head and Shoulders Over The 787.
Amazing comment when operating the 787 these many years since
October 2012. He should know he gets paid by Airbus, I mean Qatar. These
facts are known about the A-350-9.
- It’s Not
Revolutionary
- It’s Plastic
- It’s five inches
wider than the 787 which is less than a head's distance
- It’s not as
quiet as the 787.
- The 787 has
better shoulders and wings.
- The comment is
an obvious attempt at salvaging the decision for going All-in with Airbus
They have two flying in Five months. Hardly a full sampling, but
good enough to show how pride drives a comment in behalf of Airbus. It sounds
so John Leahy, it feels like extra wide money has hit a bank account.
Objectivity and substantiation of what "he" is talking about is
lacking in the comment.
A disappointing display for what Qatar has bought from Boeing,
after so much effort was put forward on its 787. Money can do many things
and this is one example, it can make a person seem smaller.
Maybe Al Baker was comparing a 787-8 with a A-350-9. He wouldn't
do that, would he?
Enough said until tomorrow!
DFW Flies Over LAX Part Too!
Today American Airlines Launched its superlative 787 recently shown in a Winging It Article during its delivery and inauguration party at DFW. Its first commercial flight just took off for Beijing, China. On a murky day as photographed with 176 passengers enjoying non top service and not having to stop over at LAX. The West Coast is fly-over country for Dallas.
"Before sunrise, American Airlines' Boeing 787 Dreamliner made its debut on a short flight to Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. AA Flight 2320 departed D/FW at at 7:10 a.m. and arrived at O'Hare a little more than two hours later at 9:32 a.m.
Landing at ORD Today in Chicago is American Airlines 787
American Airlines Dreamliner Departs on First Flight
"Before sunrise, American Airlines' Boeing 787 Dreamliner made its debut on a short flight to Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. AA Flight 2320 departed D/FW at at 7:10 a.m. and arrived at O'Hare a little more than two hours later at 9:32 a.m.
The airline will mark another historic first Thursday morning with the first nonstop flight from D/FW to Beijing. AA Flight 89 is scheduled to depart at 11:20 a.m. and should arrive in China about 13 hours later, at about 2:15 p.m. Friday.
Thursdays international trip will take place in a retrofitted Boeing 777-200. In June, the D/FW to Beijing flights will also be made using the 787 Dreamliner.
(Photo: WFAA)
DFW Has Become a California Dreaming Airport today as its fancy new Dreamliner flies over the whole west Coast from San Diego to Seattle, Wa. The wave-less DFW now has a new sheriff in town..
Wiki Photo
stuckattheairport.com
The below photo if it has any symbolism let me know. DFW is Not DIA! But this is symbolic of flying over surf and its boards going to China.
pkce.com photo
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
DIA Makes LAX Fly -Over Country
What's in an airport can be some crazy stuff. Denver International has a cult following suggesting a connection with the Rocky Mountains via an under ground system. Being in DIA, and exploring its uniqueness can leave one to wonder could this be true. With the New World Order in tow, a moving sidewalk which can express your way through a terminal concourse.
Below is this depiction
The DIA Primer: Makes this the most intriguing Airport America Has
Its statuary
Murals that need no Explanation
More to it than meet the Eye
Below is this depiction
Quoted explanation:
"The next mural no doubt expresses world peace, however notice the nations are giving their weapons to the German boy in the blonde hair and gray jacket who is “beating their swords into plowshares”. Notice the nations of the world turn their national flags and sovereignty over to the boy? He destroys the weapons of war with a hammer (hammer & sickle). He is the world leader who brings peace through communism to a war torn world. This is who I think resembles PRINCE WILLIAM!"
"The next mural no doubt expresses world peace, however notice the nations are giving their weapons to the German boy in the blonde hair and gray jacket who is “beating their swords into plowshares”. Notice the nations of the world turn their national flags and sovereignty over to the boy? He destroys the weapons of war with a hammer (hammer & sickle). He is the world leader who brings peace through communism to a war torn world. This is who I think resembles PRINCE WILLIAM!"
The bigger point about DIA is with its 787. They (787) moved the coast of California inland another 1,200 miles. Denver is LAX without a beach nearby. It has more space than Manhattan Island. I have traveled often through the terminals of DIA, and spent lay-over time riding the underground rail system while plane hopping and gawking at murals asking why? Then I read on the internet, which is the final authority on anything crazy, about its mural statues and plaques. Sound sinister, doesn't it at 2:00 am during my seat watching-waiting for the ride out to everywhere.
LA is nice place to fly over going from Denver to the Orient. Its entertaining viewing the lavish DIA art gallery. It seems the Airport has a greater purpose than being the Middle American airport as the viewer ponders. How Denver has become Washington DC of the west, with all its federal facilities dotting the Denver Landscape? Perhaps there is some truth about a secret under ground subway from DIA to NORAD in the Rockies. Next time visiting DIA watch what's around you its a grand place where it's all happening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)