The Terrible Teens and What To Do!

Like all parents who no longer can cope with a terrible teen there are options for that parent who will remedially apply techniques on that teen. The 787-8 who languishes with a thousands drops of water torture in Everett,WA. Is the billion dollar write -off that doesn't necessarily have to happen. Boeing needs to find a partner on a 787-8 project. One suggestion could have good consequences and  provide a win-win solution.

Enter a military agreement by developing those terrible teens (production numbers 11-19) in an AWACS development plan.  The large 787-8 as opposed to the much smaller 737 current submarine hunters or AWAC type aircraft could be crammed with up to one hundred specialist and its equipment to manage war on the ground, air and sea in array of devices up linked to satellites and its photography. Imagine having a 15 hour on station presence over a broad playing field directing friendlies and defeating the foes. Integrating with cruise missiles, submarine and other tactical applications. The ability to find intruders in an array of tracking devices and giving real time updates by the milli second data streams. Attacks and targets are orchestrated from above in the middle space. It would use both the up-linking of ground inputs giving targets on the ground a specific GPS address and directing that upload to war fighters is the sub space internet. Mufti tasking a large array of equipment could be the "terrible teens tasks".

So Boeing should look to the military and offer a quid quot pro deal in upgrading war field management with jets large enough and jets that can fly long enough to have a 24 hour presence in a theater of war. This integration would provide all services the ultimate high ground. Satellites have greater safety but are diminished by the ability of using up satellite resources in re positioning where an aircraft could give a broader range of services and remain on station 24 hours a day with shifts of flights with a super large command center during a crises.

To further make this case one would think a missile shoot down of this large aircraft with a hundred skilled persons would be a tragic loss. And it would be. But the same electronics on-board the large command center would also track, aircraft, missiles and its launches where a sufficient shield would protect this command center in seconds rather than minutes. Early warning and defensive measure would most certainly protect the 787 platform, as it could integrate its own defense from all the war making delivery systems from the Army, Navy and Air force at its disposal. A multi-missile attack would expend valuable resources a foe needs to sparingly use against the US Arm Force. Counter measures would be directed by the 787 Command center since it has all the data available of its resources available and to deploy it.

The 787 has plenty of electrical generation on-board to expand the AWACs mission into a true battle field command center without using up its military satellites when re positioning them. The 787 high ground can reach most satellite trajectories to relay battle field information and these terrible teens could do that Job.

John Leahy " Dogs Breakfast,", Really JOHN At An Event!

Especially when considering the status of what Dogs are in, with a Singapore Menu selection for the South East Asia cuisine.

The cover line – War over wide bodies – refers to Max Kingsley-Jones’s piece, filed from the show, about how the big two air framers were taking potshots at the other’s twin-aisle product strategy at Singapore, with Airbus’s John Leahy describing his rival’s eight-aircraft line-up in the 200- to 400-seat space as a “dog’s breakfast”. Boeing’s Randy Tinseth retorted by saying Airbus’s A350 “looks a little, too late to the market place”. - See more at: The Link 

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flight-international-editors-blog/2014/02/war-widebodies/#sthash.fegizXy2.dpuf

This is a quick quip about our Euro Trash, as in taking the trash out in Singapore. The A-350 is a lost leader blow out sale for undiscerning airlines.  Even with the 787-8 roll out into the market place glitching all the way because it is loaded with electronic opportunity for airlines, the A350 can't glitch what they don't have. Once Boeing sorts out all the advancements into a complying format it will make the A-350 a waste of time and money. Lithium -Ion is not dead, and those software issues are handled.

So John, I'm surprised, as the head sales chief as a manufacturer of flying big stuff. You make that kind of remark in South East Asia. Dog is sometimes is what's for dinner not for breakfast, assuming dogs are on the menu.

Qatar Buys Air From Boeing

Not actually air but the wind that is created, as the globe spins. Qatar has agreed to integrate Boeing wind information systems on its current fleet of 787 aircraft. Those annoying head winds will be dampened by flight management systems as it updates the latest flight conditions from wind occurrences around the world, and take advantage of both head and tails of wind. The importance of this information is called a flight management tool. Resulting in a many tiered advantage. Timeliness and fuel efficiency is the air That Boeing sales to Qatar. Fuel loads eat into the profitability of one launch. How much fuel is loaded in weight determines how much more or less the aircraft will burn. Finding the right winds could save tens of thousands of $ dollars on one trip. A global system from satellites measures jet stream and wind currents relaying that information to a target aircraft en-route to its destination. The on-board computer may tweak the flight a little north or south of the flight line drawn on its filed flight plan. A small deviation will squeeze and save more fuel for the next flight and so forth. At the end of the year one can project the what ifs out of the systems  into dollars saved directly from operations to the bottom line.

Qatar bought air flow from Boeing in a package. The sales team made a case that air can cost you money if mis-applied.

Qatar Airways and Boeing in deal to maximize in-flight operational efficiency

"Qatar Airways and Boeing have signed a five-year agreement to provide Boeing Wind Updates services for the airline to maximize in-flight operational efficiency.

Boeing Wind Updates provides customized, real-time wind and temperature information to aircraft. This data allows for more efficient trajectory prediction during pre-flight operations and continuous optimization in-flight by providing tailored wind information for flight crews and the aircraft flight management system. As part of the agreement, Boeing Wind Updates will be integrated fleet-wide, across all Qatar Airways Boeing and Airbus aircraft.

“We are pleased to upgrade our wind up-link capability by integrating the Boeing Wind Updates service into our operations at Qatar Airways to properly predict and measure current wind conditions,” said Qatar Airways CEO Akbar al-Baker."

Harrumph We'll Build That Wing Anywhere, Harrumph We'll Build The 777X Anywhere

Hey Seattle/Everett, Harrumph, Boeing isn't going anywhere, but just across the parking lot. After much consideration and flirts with States, Cities and municipalities the 777x comes totally home. Otherwise, it never left the NW or the municipality for that matter. Boeing just gave a big harrumph to the union and went back to work in Everett. The 777X magical wing is being built in Oz. Holy Corsair Batman! This wing will be carted across the hall way to assembly when completed. I know those ginormous buildings don't have hallways, that in itself is an obscene concept. The folding, flexing, and flying wing is going to be built right near the Emerald city. However it won' t be attached to flying monkeys. The 777X is the new magical bird with an all new wing, conceived in a purpose driven plans for world domination. It is rapidly gaining harrumph in Everett. Warning, the next harrumph is for Airbus. Mel Brooks, movie making mogul, would be proud of Boeing's corporate harrumphs in succession ( "Blazing Saddles" fame).

The folding, flexing and flying wing (FFFW) for those in need of a acronym has relocated to another building space. Or you could now call it the flying folding flexing Wing without losing track of the concept. Or go to the flexing, flying and folding after take-off and then landing. Otherwise FFFW makes you an expert no matter how you order the wing functions, just so the W is listed last, you become a Boeing wing type expert. From now on, I will refer to it as the folding, flexing and flying Wing on its third acronym permutation. Its easier to call it out as FFFW, then everybody is right and no one loses. All the FFFW needs is a big building number. A contest may have started to number the building. The number 42 is available and the letters "B" for bend it Beckem, or "W" for your flying monkey wings", are just flying rumors around the many buildings in Everett. Maybe an available EMC barn comes to mind. These are important issues remaining for the FFFW facilities!

A  large towing  engine would pull the wing out one door from its birthing and incubation facility to the extra large 777X production floor. Auto claves are needed for the large sections. Small  complimentary pieces could arrive from  suppliers like the flaps and leading edge components found on the Boeing 787 parts bin of suppliers. The main thing is the second largest part would move with normal equipment on hand. Perhaps even the main wing assembly fits comfortably on the 787 wing moving carts.

Since my seat is not on the board rather a very friendly confines on ones own Costco type chair. I guess with a digress. That Boeing is sewing together its plan, post haste, with its plan-in hand meeting by April. All contingencies and process for the "Facility" (FFFWF) will have final approvals available for the lead VP to sign off on. The FFFWF is now on for 2015. Those golden workers will achieve a miracle of joining the FFFW to the 777X. The program is growing on the factory floor, and becomes the FFFWF777X production sequence.  An Acronym that takes up the introductory paragraph of its white paper going up the chain of command. Eventually it is the goal of floor supervisors that it becomes a reality so they may, in production mode, initial below the mast head's work-order on the bottom line their own initials as it proceeds forward down the line. My own initials are used in this signature/production approval for the FFFWF777x-9-apb. The wing has now becomes a production reality in Everett, Wa. That wasn't hard at all, and Boeing could have avoided this whole mess of fishing for Red Herrings over the land and sea by just staying put to begin with, but they had to have its harrumph moments to justify who's boss once more.

Lithion-Ion Brings Promise Of Invention From The Mother's Necessary Nurture

Promise is the operative word. Boeing /787 woes have a sordid tale of fire and smoke and some mishap. Even though millions of passenger have already flown on the aircraft with millions of miles and hundreds of thousands cycles. That is current battery clue, ...cycles. As those cycles occur, science has isolated at the molecular level a diminished capacity to handle the electrical transactions in the battery and then begins the building of runaway heat. More cycles mean more vulnerability for a battery event. Even with the new safety precautions Boeing does not have a behavioral compliance for its Lithium-ion battery over expected usage cycles. In other words there is a chance, not on all batteries, but occasional batteries, that  a battery could deplete at its molecular  level and have inability to stay stable and not have a runaway episode. If that time would occur, then Boeing has adequate protection, and sufficient system to handle any event. The Boeing is therefore, safe for all its customers.

The lessons learned here is that the passengers should not have any hesitation about flying the 787 with its current battery strategy of treating a failing battery during flight. It may be no more worrisome than a during flight failure of a kitchen appliance where the potatoes are taken off the menu because the oven is down until arriving at its destination. That is my perspective of the current battery problem.

Establishing a safe habitat for a temperamental issue allows for the necessary time
for the evolution of battery technology, once the Achilles heal of the Lithium-ion has been exposed. Some elemental questions remain on the Boeing table with the FAA.

Should an airplane fly with the possibility of battery runaway during operations?

My own thought doesn't count or matter. Boeing has convinced those who matter and who do the counting , that things fail on all aircraft during life cycles in operation. As long as you have preventative measures installed on those habitual parts of wear and tear, then they have it covered for safe operation. That is the wear impediments Boeing addresses on the 787, a containment box.

The science report that shows promise. A new way of stabilizing The Lithium-ion battery in the lab is under study. No fires ever and no containment box period!

New Polymer Could End Battery Fires, Quadruple Efficiency

While testing the material, the team realized this perfluoropolyether — PFPE or Li/LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 for you chemists out there — could dissolve lithium salt, an indicator needed to produce conductivity in batteries. “Most polymers don’t mix with salt, but this one did,” says grad student and head researcher Dominica Wong. “And it was nonflammable.”


Boeing pushes science with its Lithium Ion Battery and science pushes back.  The "Golden Battery" maybe sooner than later. An airplane without a containment case becomes obsolete. The billion dollar answer is just a  few years away. Containment is becoming just a stop gap not a solution. Research has a new guide on to explore with promising results. Aviation is probably jumping all over this promise with added support and money.

All though this is not a panacea for the current Lithium -Ion  battery problem, it is a new path to pursue with a solid architecture for stability. Who knows how this will play out as the for the click of LI lock is found. Science will play this out with billions of $ at stake. 

In the mean time Boeing can fly on with solid containment of a mystery.

The Tired Tale Of Trouble With Charleston's 787

It was mentioned earlier in this blog that a few trained lead engineers, workers, and technicians mix in with an untrained workforce would make problems. Contract worker are hired in to calm the production woes. Its next prgression is one gigantic cluster formation on the floor. That is where Boeing is today, finding out who clustered forced who during this last surge in production.  Is this another epic movie of "Saving Ryans Privates"? I don't think so. Now Boeing rolls out its heavy cannon for a starboard broadside at any one willing to watch. Admiral McNerney commands in a very weak font this day.

"This is what happens on all of our programs," he said. "Sometimes when we break to a rate, it surfaces an issue that needs some extra attention. And that's really the story here."

Wow, I am really underwhelmed as the wings keep flapping on the factory floor in the cadence of overworked seven-day work shifts, having little sleep. That sounds an issue surfaces, and the rate is broken. The left hand fell asleep on the right hand. Corporate Boeing refuses to give in to its "Dick Headed Momentum".

They are sending in 600 more of the Light Brigade in a futile war way over near Sochi near Crimea. Everybody keep moving, nothing hapining here, and stay back from the yellow tape. All I can tell is that nothing really is happening there until Boeing restores a compitant workforce with realistic goals, other than the dreams of the board of directors.  Boeing spent too much money in Charleston to think other wise. Boeing would be spot on with 8-9 frames compleeated a month. This magical 10 is a graph and chart dream that is breaking the hearts and minds of people who want to do well but have inadequate leadership and expertise to keep the wheels on the production cart. It takes tens years to build the magic on the floor. Charleston been at now for three years barely. Now Boeing up the rates and pinkies are getting jammed in the process. Barrels colide at the mid section. Workers are just plain beat with 10 a month game plan.

Why can't they do it like Everett, WA where they have built every big airplane since 1969. Well, that a no brainer when you put contractors and temporaries and a smattering of key people together to build the most advanced aircraft flying today. Your B team is trying really hard but they are lacking a solid leadership base experienced in putting the 787 together consistantly. Too many mishaps, misteps and regrets occur every week.. They Know how to do it! Because they are doing it. Ten aircraft rate breaks the rubber band holding Charleston together, and Boeing knows the whole production scheme is at risk unless they stop sending out memos from board meeting directing more airplane production without having the real status of the factory echoing from those who really know what they need to do, but will only tell that everything is fine just like McNerney stated earlier in this article, (fading font)

"This is what happens on all of our programs," he said. "Sometimes when we break to a rate, it surfaces an issue that needs some extra attention. And that's really the story here."

Rumors Of The 747-8I Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

Mark Twain, American Humorist, once penned something that way with himself in mind. The 747-8I hangs in there with a sale by sale determination. By no means is the 747-8I dead. Boeing's sales minions are developing relationships so airline executives will listen. They talk about the 777X and the MAX. These sales teams continuously speak of the 787-8-9-10. By then an airline is clobbered with a 747-8I proposal they often don't see coming or consider. A perfectly normal response could be, "I thought the 747-8I died! So goes the saga of the 747-8.

Airplane aficionados also think the 747 is a stop gap order that will soon fade into the sunset. The Airbus A-380 is the biggest in the sky. It hold the most passengers and is extremely quiet and so forth. However, sales have slowed on this behemoth, just short of a break even order book number. Remember the 787 is rapidly approaching a Boeing break-even point order book number.

So the 747-8I is only a statement aircraft in response to the A-380. Its four engines seeks after a fuely hydrated twin engine market. Is the 747-8 dead? Mark Twain suggest a gross exaggeration of rumors. Answered earlier, no way! Its going about its business in a quiet four engine march. Freight keeps its plant doors churning copy. Lufthansa has no complaints and a few others are sneaking orders past the press, much to the irritation of Airbus.  So what does Boeing sales department have up its sleve when it comes to the 747-8I. I clipped something out of the Singapore Airshow press briefings from Boeing's sales chief at the show, Dinesh Keskar.

"Not surprisingly, Keskar ranks Singapore as perhaps the top market for Boeing in Southeast Asia, and one particularly suited to the 777X. But he also emphasized the potential embodied in the likes of Garuda Indonesia, which has expressed interest in the 747-8I, ..."

 Boeing Bullish About its Slice of Asian Market

That statement allows for a CPR breath for the 747-8I. The 777X 406 seat market shores up continuity from top to bottom in capacity from the 150 to the 747, 465 seat carrier, Boeing claims a 10% per seat advantage over similar configured aircraft refering to the A-380. Flying with empty seats is a higher risk with the 525 seat Airbus. Fat marrkets can do it with a 747-8i. South East Asia is a fat market (growing). Interest is higher than Airbus would like in these unique markets concerning the 747-8i. Airbus continues to rumor the 747 death. The 747 keeps showing up at the market place party held around the world as some kind of rude party crasher that is well out of fashion and unwanted by Airbus.

Moving Average Is A Better Indicator Of 787 Production

January numbers are in for Boeing 787 delivery. The true financial number for measuring output. Delivery takes into account all stops and goings on with the Boeing machine of production. A Boeing aircraft moves off the floor in under thirty days but languishes for months until disposition. Here is a 90 day moving average of that disposition which truely reflect a better picture of obstacles encountered  before getting into customer hands.

Month/Year       Delivered             90-day Moving Average Number
October/2013            9                              8.3
November/2013        5                              6.7
December/2013       11                             8.3
January/2014             4                             6.7

The 90 day average smooths out time and numbers when an aircraft is going out the door, it receives additional time for readiness or additional time from the customer is required. If it moves out and is counted as built, it may sit additional weeks into the next month.A moving average captures those anomalies and smooths it into a relative time frame of those production barriers not usually accounted for by Boeing.

An October built 787 may deliver in December. Those December delivered 787 may have frames from the preceding 90 preceding days of which they were built and ready for delivery. They may be built in October and counted as part of the 10 787 built that month, but additional work from both Boeing and the customer may continue for some time. Making the delivery date a more accurate count time for production since it captures all production steps until customers takes possession. That is why some months deliver 11 and some only 4 even though Boeing says it builds ten.

If one averages on a 90 day delivery cycle, an assumption is made that within a 90 day frame work of time, a monthly average smooths outs those impediments to production with a realistic number. Boeing chooses a build rate of when it is rolled out the door during the month cutting off all outside issues from the ten build plan per month.  Statistical measures can tell many stories. When the moving average hits 10 from month to month, I would say Boeing is on target. If Boeing delivers 120 787 in 2014, then they mean what they say.

Renton Washington's 737, The Antithesis Of Charleston's 787.

The 737 is going to 42 NG a Month. All sizes, shapes and colors. Boeing plans to eventually go Long with over 50 a month as it extends its plant floor space for the MAX. The How's, Why and What is going on there, the 737 is wrapped up into a mad cadence of two-a -day, with football like training. The secret is in a production plan as it`s executed in a special cadence. Take the micro scope down to one worker on the production floor. That worker has a job to do and it hasn't changed much over the plants quantum change. This worker still has its work orders, tools and methods intact. No hurry or a frenetic pace is present. Panic does not exist or does running to and fro. What has change is an efficient way of sequencing workload through those same work stations. The theory is that skilled people would not have to relearn new jobs but only continue with less production barricades from the older process. The work floor studied what were awkward impediments, and removed them from the process. It also implemented seamless ways for work flows. Just-in-time artistry came from a lengthy learning curve.

The work flow in tributaries come to the main channel found near the exit door for the 737 NG. Going from 34 a month to 42 a month without a depreciation of work quality or an individual workload increase per person, is the secret. Workers on the floor does it without  panic or a helter-skelter herculaneum effort, but with the same calm demeanor they did several years back. Only at the convergence of the collective effort does that energy result in an 737. To the worker, work may be more comfortable and efficient. Boeing is spending money on plant utilization of square footage. It is removing old school layouts and improving the distances taken for ingress and egress. Boeing has taken into account the addition of the Max line and planned out how that will incorporate without any disruption to the NG line. Once the NG new orders exhaust, Boeing will simply increase production using the NG space in dual with the Max production. Integration of work teams with keeping the workforce experts intact on the same square footage of plant space. If an NG comes down the line instead of the Max it will be treated with an "NG expertise workforce", and the Max is like wise when its new frame arrives. Production computers will keep the parts assigned to aircraft type will only go into the prescribed work station. The worker, professionally and calmly continues with their craft. A steady progress is the theme. "Do it right or don't do it." The right people in the right place for the right job is calmly executed. Just like a part arriving at the right point in the process so does the right person show up to handle it. The symphony continues without confusion, panic  or trouble. The 737 facility has been doing this for a long time.

Its not the technology that has flummoxed Charleston, SC., because of all that "new technology", it is the method of marshaling the work force in a centered effort matching its workforce maturity. Progressions should only move when every thing is correct. You can move a plant thousands of miles away, but you forgot to move your best people with it. If you do move your best people, then you leave the former post in disarray. That is Boeing's conundrum. Plant expansion is done by bull-dozers. Plant performance is that special formulation of its people. Example: How can an NFL team go from the Super Bowl Champs one year to mediocre the next. Only a few players retire, and a few coaches take on another gig and a couple more players get paid more going with another team. The sum of personnel has been tampered with significantly and becomes mediocrity waiting for the next great revival of team chemistry. The Team chemistry in South Carolina is seeking that "it" moment. They lack that "it". Renton has that "it" and they know how to keep "it" going. Don't fix the "it" fix the problem. Renton has identified what it needs to do and is marching forward without tampering with the "it". Boeing management must take those lessons from the North West, capture it in a bottle and let it go in Charleston. Sounds simple, but its not. A similar effects on why a prize pumpkin grows so big in one spot and in another spot its just an ordinary pumpkin.  The sum of "its" environment of that gigantic pumpkin is the secret. When Charleston or any other place achieves that environment found in the North West then it will grow giant pumpkins too!

Newspaper slams S.C. Boeing plant for "poorly done work"

Building The 787 Where Angels Fear To Tread

Sitting in a room 10 years ago someone had a bright idea! Let's rid ourselves of this blight found in the Northwest Unions. I for one don't adhere to the principles of unionism for various reason, but do acknowledge, the unions have played a significant role in the development of excellence. Even though the road is often rocky, the only motivations of unions are those benefits its leadership promises during each contract cycle.

South Carolina airplane building has a problem or greater than the sum of its workforce. Boeing intellect decided to build a union busting plant for its 787. That same leadership forgot to do several import things, like put people in positions who are realistic, and don't promise everything to get ahead.

In order to make the Charleston project work, upper management had set unrealistic goals and objectives beyond the capabilities of the newly formed plant culture.  Yes, plant culture. The culture is built upon a diverse population of workers from various backgrounds. The Everett model of culture is significantly different than Charleston's culture. Everett was not emulated in Charleston.  The can-do spirit in Everett, where it knows what it can do, will buck back if something isn't right.

In Charleston they will push through whether wires are connected or not. Management may parrot back yes we can even without a clue. The Everett Management is not competing with its list of unrealistic goals, but is competing with doing it right the first time.  Charleston has a corporate culture of not fully aware of having a matured production culture.

So Boeing is in transition of catching Charleston up with 80 plus years of building airplanes under the stress of war, commercial enterprise and finally advance technology in what the Boeing world is now experiencing. The Charleston building airplane culture did not exist five years ago. Boeing cobbled together this work force from some Everett people, surplus Engineers and walk up workers. Its management pool is given goals that are out there, while the team accepts that it can do anything to get there. The workforce of young and older upward mobile types have tendencies to do an over the top assessment of capabilities. They accept unrealistic goals with glee.

In Charleston they have colliding mid barrel sections, missing parts and incomplete work. Early signs of a no problem mentality refusing to get its culture in order. Everett is an airplane building culture is more calm and purpose driven. The Charleston culture is in a race to beat Everett. A job well-over its production rate's head. Charleston needs to reload the workforce, as it should have in the beginning.

The reason I know this because of where Charleston is today. The unit is struggling and overworks the problems. Everett has a well-conceived pace from its airplane building culture. Charleston will get there in three years, and Boeing knows it. Charleston must gain a superior mindset for getting it right the first time as Everett does reflexively. Those cultural memory muscles exist in Everett, but does not appear in Charleston, as that plant sorts out its mishaps.

Charleston Must Achieve The Following:

1.  A generational airplane building Culture.

2.  Memory Muscle on the production floor.

3.  Leadership immune from Corporate Rhetoric

4.  An Organization Focused On Getting it Right

5.  The main purpose is the main purpose

Sounds almost Union, but it isn't, it sounds like craftsmanship.